That's one thing we didn't like much." "An area for improvement in OPNsense is the hardware, which needs to be updated more frequently.ĭNS blocking is another good feature I want to be added to the solution. When you are deploying via GitHub or another source repository, this is not possible. We have used other firewalls, such as FortiGate, that you can configure via code. "We did not like the fact that you have to configure everything with the graphic user interface. Similarly, when you have many IPS rules and policies, it slows down, and there is an impact on its performance." Even for small changes, you have to wait for 60 seconds or maybe more, which is not good.
#Sophos utm vs pfsense how to
For example, with SecureX, I am yet to find out how to forward security events to different tools such as Microsoft Sentinel, which is what we use for log detection." "When you make any changes, irrespective of whether they are big or small, Firepower takes too much time. It is just a bit confusing with the newer generational equipment on what it can do." "The integration between different tools could be improved. "The stability could be better because we have a lot of issues with the stability of Cisco Firepower." "Firepower's user experience should be a little bit better." "The overall licensing structure could improve to make the solution better." "A feature that would allow me to load balance among multiple ISPs, especially since we have deployed it as a perimeter firewall, would be a great addition." "It integrates with other security products from Cisco, but sometimes, there can be glitches or errors." "I would like it if they made the newer generation a bit simpler.
#Sophos utm vs pfsense install
It is also easy to install and can be deployed and maintained by one team member." "It is much simpler than other solutions such as Fortinet." We like the OpenVPN clients that can be deployed using pfSense very much." "I like pfSense's security features." "It is a stable solution. I think it just provides the end user, specifically for us small, medium business providers of services, the flexibility we need at the right cost to provide them a higher end, almost enterprise type service." "Technical support is perfect, excellent." "pfSense is easy to use, has user-friendly dashboards, and useful blocking features." "My technicians find the pfSense's web interface very useful. Some people may think you're taking a risk with using Opensource. Enterprises don't always have that kind of money to invest." "What I found most valuable is the cost of the platform, the flexibility of the platform, and the fact that the ongoing fees are not there as they are with the competitor. Other solutions that I have had in the past were very expensive. It is the best way to provide a remote work facility to employees at a very low cost. "It is a very good solution for enterprises that need a VPN for their employees. You can see, straight away, if there's a firewall rule allowing that traffic in the direction you're trying to troubleshoot." "All the features except IPS are valuable. If someone calls because they're having problems, you can easily create fake traffic without having to do an extended packet capture. We are able to have a bigger team that can handle simple tasks and have a smaller team focus on the deep-dive needs." "The most valuable feature is the Intrusion Prevention System." "The most beneficial aspect of the Cisco Secure Firewall is the An圜onnect component within the firewall package, which we selected specifically for VPN usage due to its exceptional integration with various third-party devices and applications." "The Packet Tracer is a really good tool. "Firepower has reduced our firewall operational costs by about 25 percent." "It just works for us." "The ASDM (Adaptive Security Device Manager) which is the graphical user interface, works out, and Cisco keeps it current." "Cisco Secure Firewall made it easier so that more than one person can handle things.
0 kommentar(er)
